React Native Agency

The price varies above all with the number of screens, the connections to your existing tools and the functions requested, such as offline mode or integrated payment. Every React Native project is priced on quotation, once the first perimeter has been framed and your needs specified with your team. When a React site is already running at your end, part of its business logic can sometimes be reused on the mobile side, which lightens certain stages without removing the need for precise scoping to set a reliable budget.

A standard React Native project calls for 21 to 60 days between the first conversation and publication on both stores; allow 60 days if the scope covers several modules. Scoping, design, development, testing on different phones and validation by Apple and by Google take up most of that time. When part of the code can be reused from an existing React site, certain stages move faster, without that removing the need for precise scoping before announcing a final deadline.

React Native is the obvious choice when your technical team already knows JavaScript or when a React site is already running: the language, the working habits and sometimes part of the business logic are then found again on the mobile side, which speeds up the start and makes future hiring easier. Flutter remains a solid alternative when the priority is a strictly identical interface on both platforms, with no link to an existing JavaScript codebase. We choose according to the team and the tools already in place at your end, never by default.

Yes. We then start by auditing the code, the libraries used and their maintenance status, a point that matters particularly in this ecosystem where dependencies evolve fast and where some end up abandoned by their authors. This audit separates what remains solid from what has to be updated before adding new functions. You then receive a prioritised list of work, costed before any commitment, so as to start again on a sound base rather than inheriting technical debt that is hard to assess.

Once the application is published, you can take out an annual maintenance package, whose price follows the actual scope of the project: updating the JavaScript dependencies, compatibility with new versions of iOS and Android, fixes and small developments. The libraries in this ecosystem change often, and regular follow-up avoids having to bring everything up to date at once after several months without work. This package remains optional: you keep the freedom to stop it or to entrust that follow-up to an internal team if your organisation changes.

Yes, entirely, from delivery onwards: code repository, the Apple and Google developer accounts used for publication, the documentation needed to take the project over. It is a point we highlight with teams already comfortable with JavaScript, who often want to keep the possibility of taking back control in house over all or part of the application without depending on our agency in the long run. This independence matters particularly for teams already able to code themselves.

Search visibility for a mobile application does not work like that of a website: Google and Apple mainly index the listing published on their stores, whose title, description and visuals we work on at launch. When the application shares its code base with a React site, the two often evolve in parallel, which makes consistency of content easier on both sides. Organic search visibility remains carried by the website; the application then builds loyalty among visitors already convinced.