Next.js Agency

A site with a limited scope, a few pages with no complex application logic, remains the quickest case to price. The rate then climbs with the number of pages, the business logic to develop and the connections needed to your existing tools: a showcase site and a platform with a logged-in area are nowhere near the same budget, even with a comparable number of pages. After a conversation about your scope and your performance objectives, we draw up a quote covering the architecture, the development and going live, validated before any development starts.

For a standard scope, allow 21 to 60 days between the first discussion and going live, the time to frame the architecture, develop the pages and connect the real data. A broader platform, with several logged-in areas or developed application logic, calls for closer to 60 days. The precise schedule depends on the functional scope agreed after scoping, never on a fixed duration announced before seeing the project, and it includes a dedicated margin to adjust the performance measured just before the site's final release.

The question is not one of technical preference, but of application logic. WordPress suits you if your team publishes and edits content day to day with no particular processing: pages, posts, offers. Next.js becomes the obvious choice when the site has to stay very fast under a large volume of automatically generated pages, or run business logic specific to your activity, which a WordPress theme does not do natively. We settle this choice from the first conversation, according to what the site has to accomplish day to day for your visitors.

Yes, we start with a technical audit: the rendering strategy used page by page, the dependencies installed, the actual loading time and the debt accumulated in the project's structure. This diagnosis brings out the slowest or least findable pages, which we fix first before dealing with the rest of the site. A complete rebuild remains rare, reserved for cases where the underlying architecture blocks any clean evolution, which happens above all on projects started with no real architecture at the outset.

It is offered but never imposed, in the form of an optional annual package priced according to the actual scope of the site delivered. This package covers three specific points: updating the framework's dependencies, monitoring loading time over the long run, and handling errors reported in production. A site that gains pages over time sees its package adjusted accordingly, up or down, according to what has actually changed since the initial delivery.

Yes, in full: the source code, the version control repository and the hosting access come to you from going live onwards, with no distinction between what we developed and what you already had. Since Next.js is an open source framework published by Vercel, no clause attaches you to Skyward for the rest of the project, whether it is minor fixes or a complete rebuild entrusted to another team, in house or external. We keep no technical access once delivery is signed off, and the choice of host afterwards belongs entirely to you, including if you change it later.

Yes, and that is precisely what sets Next.js apart from a React interface alone: pages are built on the server before reaching the visitor, which makes them easier for indexing robots to read. From delivery onwards, we configure the markup structure, the loading times and the structured data useful for search. Rankings then keep evolving with the content published and the pages added as your business grows, follow-up we can provide if you wish.